tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9864092.post7485343887801012767..comments2016-08-26T02:43:19.040-07:00Comments on Eide Neurolearning Blog: Overthinking and Creativity - Think Like ChildDrs. Fernette and Brock Eidehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01943025422546686625noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9864092.post-38244518099493347532014-12-02T03:43:57.627-08:002014-12-02T03:43:57.627-08:00Since the number of closed loops per digit remains...Since the number of closed loops per digit remains constant every time the number appears, applying a quantitative value to each digit yields the same answer as if we simply counted the loops in each series of four digits.<br /><br />I wish I had noticed the closed loops, but after trying several other incorrect methods, I solved it in under ten minutes by assigning values to each number and adding them. Basically, each number is a "text" variable. PreBigBangerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07653136262369258267noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9864092.post-56422332825492999192014-12-02T03:37:36.390-08:002014-12-02T03:37:36.390-08:00that's because 0 is worth 1. 1 is equal to a v...that's because 0 is worth 1. 1 is equal to a value of 0 :)<br />so it's like adding, <br />A) 1+1+1+1 = 0 and 1+0+1+2 = 1<br />B) 0+0+0+0 = 0 and 0+1+0+0 = 1PreBigBangerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07653136262369258267noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9864092.post-29926488442510396042014-03-18T07:38:19.797-07:002014-03-18T07:38:19.797-07:00Quick people missed point. Look at your reasoning...Quick people missed point. Look at your reasoning. 1111 = 0 but 1012 = 1.Me Edgellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08314280640137418478noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9864092.post-31419802249068183512014-03-18T07:35:46.901-07:002014-03-18T07:35:46.901-07:00People who answ quickly and think they are correct...People who answ quickly and think they are correct because they reached 2 are missing the point. Applying the same reasoning to all the sums means you're answer would be incorrect. 1111 = 0 but 1012 = 1Me Edgellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08314280640137418478noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9864092.post-46081398651699849282014-02-07T11:13:33.375-08:002014-02-07T11:13:33.375-08:00Same here and same method took me a minute...well ...Same here and same method took me a minute...well as it says i do not agree because hell yeah! I am a programmer...:PTushar Yadavhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17637961652794043246noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9864092.post-59362102926530972652014-02-07T11:11:25.159-08:002014-02-07T11:11:25.159-08:00Same here took me a minute figuring out the same l...Same here took me a minute figuring out the same logic well hell yeah i am a programmer....Tushar Yadavhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17637961652794043246noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9864092.post-3479392739514664912013-07-18T22:01:07.879-07:002013-07-18T22:01:07.879-07:00Reminds me of a puzzle I read not long ago:
"...Reminds me of a puzzle I read not long ago:<br /><br />"Which of these verbs is not like the others? bring, buy, catch, draw, fight, find, teach, think"<br /><br />When I read "catch, fight" I thought of "catch fish" -- which led me to notice that "think" was the only verb that couldn't take a concrete direct object (you can bring a fish, you can buy a fish, you can catch a fish, you can draw a fish, you can fight a fish, you can find a fish, you can teach a fish to swim, but you can't think a fish). But that wasn't the answer on the next page.Chris Hennickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03639445454370696616noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9864092.post-9399769178625083222012-08-01T16:58:42.929-07:002012-08-01T16:58:42.929-07:00Ten seconds. I feel like the problem was advertis...Ten seconds. I feel like the problem was advertised as much harder than it is.CHADhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09380595397146222650noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9864092.post-73422770218341116482012-05-25T07:39:43.714-07:002012-05-25T07:39:43.714-07:00I used logic to get my answer in under a minute. I...I used logic to get my answer in under a minute. I decided that if preschool children got the answer quickly, it couldn't have anything to do with math ... patterns, or counting, or calculating. So, I thought like a child and figured out to look for the "circles." I'm definitely an overthinker, but I'm also highly logical, which helped me in this problem.Cindyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11452795238901796924noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9864092.post-28497609374949802482012-04-30T20:47:21.994-07:002012-04-30T20:47:21.994-07:00Same method as you... in under a minute. And plen...Same method as you... in under a minute. And plenty of higher education.zencathttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17896253631581597923noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9864092.post-1434608520814181102012-04-23T14:49:34.024-07:002012-04-23T14:49:34.024-07:00I got the right answer in under a minute,but just ...I got the right answer in under a minute,but just in a totally different way. I looked at the numbers 2=0, because 2222=0, 1=0 because 1111=0. 3333 = 0, 9=1 because 9999=4, and since 8193=3, 8=2 therefore,2581=2mathmehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09198142269829371676noreply@blogger.com